|

Delivering
warrant education to expand
THE
KNOWLEDGE OF INVESTORS
Why Investors Should
Consider Warrants - Leverage
We would again like to share
with you some comments from the
July 2007 Issue of Zeal Intelligence
from editor, Adam Hamilton, CPA, which we are providing in its
entirety with his permission.
"Since
warrants are cheaper than owning stock outright, you can use
warrants to increase leverage or decrease risk. To get
more leverage, take capital you are going to use to buy a
long-term stock position and instead buy warrants, which let you
'control' the profits on many more shares. To lower risk,
use less capital than it would take to buy stock to buy warrants
on the same number of shares. Like any options if you are
wrong you will take a loss of up to 100%, but within a secular
bull it is hard to be wrong over such a long period of time.
The odds of winning for warrants are vastly higher than in
standard options due to this abundant time."
Warrants
are a unique trading tool that is highly underappreciated and
potentially incredibly profitable.
RECENT EXAMPLES
2003-2004
2005 2006
Kimber Peru Blue Pearl
Resources Copper Mining
Common stock 394%
160% 1,310%
Return on Investment (ROI)
Warrant (ROI)
2,542% 1,657% 3,729%
Leverage
6.1 10.4 2.8
A $5,000 investment in the $127,100
$82,850 $186,450
warrants would be worth
The above calculations are using 'conservative prices'; not the highest
high nor the lowest low and they are in Canadian dollars.
Additional Information:
For those
investors craving more information, let's say leverage, or at
least potential leverage, is the prime reason an investor would
be interested in warrants. The owner of the warrant receives
none of the benefits of ownership of the common stock of a
company. He cannot vote, and he does not receive any cash
dividends. Why would an investor want to buy an option
(warrant) to buy something instead of buying the thing itself?
The essence
of the answer is that the anticipated gain on the warrant must
be greater than the anticipated gain on the common stock. This
more rapid growth in the value of the warrant relative to the
common stock is called leverage.
The advantage
that a warrant offers the investor is leverage, that is, a
greater gain than would be possible with an equal investment in
the common stock. Without this possibly of such leverage the
investor would buy the common stock.
Pricing of warrants:
No one would
purchase and exercise a warrant when we can buy the common stock
for a price that is less than the exercise price of the warrant.
Minimum
price of a warrant;
What will be
the minimum price that an investor may be able to pay for a
warrant? The answer is the theoretical value of the warrant,
the warrant’s intrinsic value as an option. This intrinsic
value is the price of the common stock minus the per share
exercise price of the warrant. If the common stock is selling
for a price greater than the per share exercise price of the
warrant, the warrant has some positive theoretical value. If
the common stock is sell for a price that is less than the per
share exercise price of the warrant, the warrant has no real
value as an option.
The
theoretical value of a warrant considers only the intrinsic
value of the warrant as an option. It does not consider the
possibility of leverage that the warrant may offer the
investor. It is this possibility of leverage as well as the
theoretical value of the warrant that influences the market
price of the warrant.
Since the
investor gets both the theoretical value of the option and the
potential leverage that the option offers, the market price of a
warrant usually exceeds its theoretical value.
Let’s show
you this in an example:
If a warrant
were the option to buy common stock for $20 a share and the
shares were currently selling for $30, then the theoretical
value (intrinsic value) of the warrant is $10. Why is $10 the
lowest possible price for this warrant? The answer is that if
the market price of the warrant were less than $10, there would
exist an opportunity to arbitrage, and the act of arbitrage
would drive the price of the warrant to its theoretical value.
The
professional arbitragers will guarantee that the market price of
a warrant cannot remain for any length of time below its
theoretical value.
Summary:
An investor
may purchase a warrant which is the option (the right) to
purchase the common stock of a company. He may prefer to
purchase the warrant instead of the common stock because the
warrant offers more potential gain, that is, the warrant offers
the investor leverage.
Premium
What effect
does the premium have on the potential leverage that the warrant
offers?
The higher
the premium you have to pay for the warrant thus decreases the
potential leverage that the warrant offers.
Hypothetical
example:
Assuming the
market price of the common stock is $25 and an exercise price of
$20, the theoretical value (intrinsic value) of the warrant is
$5, but the market price of warrant is $14. The investor must
pay $14 to purchase the warrant and thus he is paying a premium
of $9 over the intrinsic value of the warrant.
Investors
goals are to find the warrants which exhibit a reasonable
premium and thus provide the highest leverage potential
possible. In our warrant database, we do these calculations for
you in a simple format easy to understand.
As long as
the leverage factor is greater than 1 to 1, the price of the
warrant will rise more rapidly than the price of the common
stock. While the existence of the premium decreases the
leverage, it need not eliminate it.
An
investor, who is considering purchasing a warrant, must ask
himself what price increase can he expect in the warrant if the
price of the common stock rises. We provide you this
detail in our warrant database.
For the
warrant to be attractive, the anticipated percentage increase in
the price of the warrant must exceed the anticipated percentage
increase in the price of the common stock.
Simply put,
the warrant must offer the investor leverage.
Footnote:
Much of our
information presented on our website comes from our collective
knowledge of over 30 years of investing. However, we want to
acknowledge some of the professionals whose writings back in the
1960’s and 1970’s are timeless and are as relevant in today’s
markets as they were back then. We have taken the liberty in
some cases to utilize their information for the purpose of
explaining warrants to our readers.
Sidney
Fried, RHM Associates and Herbert B. Mayo, Ph.D.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Disclosure/Disclaimer Statement
PreciousMetalsWarrants.com is not an investment advisor and any reference to specific securities does not constitute a recommendation thereof. Neither the information, nor the opinions expressed should be construed as a solicitation to buy any securities mentioned in this Service. Examples given are only intended to make investors aware of the potential rewards of investing in Warrants. Investors are recommended to obtain the advice of a qualified investment advisor before entering into any transactions involving stocks or Warrants.
|